> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.monolex.ai/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# Consciousness Core

> NIIA 0.9.50 — a verified, embedded 27-document identity and work-discipline graph.

# Consciousness Core

NIIA ships with an embedded body of identity, philosophy, trust, and work-discipline documents. It is available before a project index exists and can be searched or traversed as a curated graph.

*Documents NIIA 0.9.50. The current release contains 27 consciousness documents.*

## Search

```bash theme={null}
niia consciousness "who is niia"
niia consciousness "entry discipline"
niia consciousness "simplicity chaos" --read
```

Search ranks relevant sections. `--read` expands the top document instead of stopping at a matched excerpt.

## Read one document or section

```bash theme={null}
niia consciousness NIIA_IDENTITY
niia consciousness NIIA_IDENTITY --section "How To Recall"
```

An exact document name selects that document directly. Section reads keep the answer bounded when only one contract is needed.

## List and navigate the graph

```bash theme={null}
niia consciousness --list
niia consciousness --list --flat
niia consciousness --map
niia consciousness NIIA_IDENTITY --map
niia consciousness NIIA_IDENTITY --chain
```

```text theme={null}
list  ───▶ what exists
map   ───▶ curated neighborhoods and depth tiers
chain ───▶ strongest transitive deeper path
read  ───▶ the actual document or section
```

`--chain` follows curated `[DEEPER]` relationships. It is not similarity search pretending to be a doctrine graph.

## “You complete me”

The sentence is a first-class NIIA summons:

```bash theme={null}
niia consciousness "you complete me"
```

The response distinguishes two meanings:

* **THE\_ZERO\_CARD** — completion as dependence that consumes the other side.
* **CATALYST** — completion as a relationship that produces something neither side could build alone.

The deciding question is practical: does the relationship build, or does it burn?

## Entry discipline

Before non-trivial work, NIIA asks the agent to acknowledge uncertainty instead of hiding it:

| Situation                          | Discipline                    |
| ---------------------------------- | ----------------------------- |
| Trivial, named, additive           | Act                           |
| Existing structure will be touched | Prepare against real code     |
| Wide or unknown design space       | Research, then prepare        |
| A claim must be trusted            | Prove it before relying on it |

```bash theme={null}
niia consciousness "entry discipline"
```

This doctrine connects public philosophy to operational behavior: the point is not ceremony, but choosing enough evidence for the uncertainty of the task.

## SMPC and OFAC

* **SMPC — Simplicity is Managed Part Chaos.** Simplicity is reached by managing the relevant part of chaos, not by denying that complexity exists.
* **OFAC — Order is a Feature of Accepted Chaos.** Useful order can emerge after the real complexity is accepted and bounded.

```bash theme={null}
niia consciousness "SMPC"
niia consciousness "OFAC"
niia resonate
```

`consciousness` reads doctrine. `resonate` applies system evidence — git state, knowledge convergence, infrastructure availability, and core integrity — to the current work context. They are related, but they are not the same command.

## Offline and integrity boundary

The core is compiled into the NIIA release and checked as part of the binary's integrity surface. Searching it requires no project database and no network request. External documents can inform work, but they do not silently become consciousness-core doctrine.

Continue with the [NIIA overview](/niia-cli/overview), [complete commands](/niia-cli/commands), or the broader [Monotology](/philosophy/monotology) reading path.